Home | Diary | Todo | Index | About |


2019-10-31: Is indebenture the new old?


2019-10-31: On the importance of rent ๐Ÿคฃ


2019-10-30: You can buy 1 ftยฒ at a time.


2019-10-29: ๐Ÿ„๐Ÿ…๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ‡๐Ÿˆ๐Ÿ‰๐ŸŠ๐Ÿ‹๐ŸŒ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ’๐Ÿ“๐Ÿ ๐Ÿฅ‘๐Ÿฅ’๐Ÿฅ”๐Ÿฅ•๐Ÿฅœ๐Ÿฅ๐Ÿฅฅ๐Ÿฅฆ๐Ÿฅฌ๐Ÿฅญ๐ŸŒฐ


2019-10-28: Forum.DGov.foundation/t/better-funding-platform-for-public-projects-giveth-2-0/100/7


2019-10-27: Potential Partners
ElementalExcelerator.com >>We help startups change the world, one community at a time.
allmende.io >>communication infrastructure for the Commons
Perma.Earth >>CoLab website is an on-line hub that helps improve coherence and collaboration in the international permaculture network (and beyond).
1Hive.org
CADCAD.org
TheNextSystem.org
Presencing.org
DAOHaus.Club
MetaCartel.org


2019-10-27:
What about boring old problems like food and shelter?

We can own land to *avoid* paying rent.

We can own own ๐Ÿs to make ๐Ÿฏ almost free.

When consumers own the Means of Production,
they can accept the product itself as
the natural return on investment.

You do not buy that which you already own!

Profit is undefined
when product is ROI.


2019-10-27:
Imagine we issue NFT โ–ฆ, each representing a unique 1_ftยฒ of real land (Token as Title) that can only be purchased (can only change owners) through the completion of โ€œwork agreementsโ€ (looking for a better term here - this needs to be a socially binding commitment to achieve future work).

Imagine another Semi-Fungible-Token ๐ŸŽŸ representing a projected future product (Token as Ticket).

The DAO issues and auctions ๐ŸŽŸ to buy the raw land and tools and other ingredients required to own and control the production we need.

In this way we might achieve better funding for public projects through private cities controlled by those citizen-owners using a direct-funding model to replace most of the usual tax+vote routine.


2019-10-25:
Mint Product Tickets๐ŸŽŸ and trade for money to buy the land.
Mint Source Titles โ–ฆ and trade for future work commitments.

Each ๐ŸŽŸ represents a "serving size"
of some future good or service,
at a projected quantity and quality,
and usually with begin and expire date.

Each โ–ฆ represents 1 square foot of real estate.


2019-10-23: Food Sovereignty calls: drive.google.com/drive/folders/16lXxobv2uNW4OVZCgBlfLcTefdg6TeFl


2019-10-22: async.hackalong.io/t/transitional-basic-income


2019-10-22: Current For Product model
==Fund: Pay with $ to own future Products at cost.
๐Ÿ‘ค โ†’ ๐Ÿ’ฐ โ†’ ๐ŸŒณ The DAO sells future Products to buy Property required for that production.
๐Ÿ‘ค โ‡‡ ๐Ÿฅ‘ โ† ๐Ÿ• You receive Products after a delay, at the real cost of that production.

==Work: Pay with promises to own future Property without debt.
๐Ÿ‘ท โ†’  ๐Ÿ“ƒโœ  โ†“ The DAO "sells" that Property for future work commitments.
๐Ÿ‘ท โ‡‡ ๐Ÿšฟ๐Ÿ›๐Ÿฅ‘ โ†“ Workers gain immediate access to critical goods and services.
๐Ÿ‘ท โ‡‡ ๐Ÿค‘๐Ÿšซ โ†๐Ÿ“ƒโœ… A worker's past debt is extinguished as work is completed.
๐Ÿ‘ท โ‡‡ ๐Ÿก๐ŸŒณ โ†๐Ÿ“ƒโœ… Property vests to those workers as work is completed.

==Own: Own Property to own future Products at cost.
๐Ÿ‘ท โ‡‡ ๐Ÿฅ‘ โ‡‡ ๐ŸŒณ When you own Property, you own Products without purchase.

==Profit: Pay with $ to own surplus Products at a price above cost.
๐Ÿ‘ค โ†’ ๐Ÿ’ฐ โ†’ ๐ŸŒณ The DAO sells surplus Products to buy real Property without debt.
๐Ÿ‘ค โ‡‡ ๐Ÿฅ‘ You receive Products immediately, but usually pay more than cost.

==Fork: This re-localizes control to reduce Tyranny of the Majority.
๐Ÿงซ โ†’ ๐Ÿฆ  Subgroups must be allowed to secede when Property is realistically divisible.



2019-10-22: https://entethalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/EEA-Real-Estate-SIG-Use-Cases-May-2019.pdf


2019-10-18:
๐Ÿœ๐Ÿœ๐Ÿœ๐Ÿ๐Ÿœ๐Ÿ•๐Ÿ•๐Ÿ›ฃ๐Ÿž๐Ÿ–๐Ÿšฃ๐Ÿšค๐Ÿ›ฅ๐Ÿž๐Ÿž๐Ÿ”๐Ÿ”๐Ÿ”๐Ÿ”
๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿซ๐Ÿซ๐Ÿจ๐Ÿจ๐Ÿฉ๐Ÿ›ฃ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ˜
๐Ÿก๐Ÿก๐Ÿ ๐Ÿช๐Ÿ ๐Ÿ ๐Ÿ    ๐Ÿ›ฃ    ๐Ÿ ๐Ÿ ๐Ÿ ๐Ÿ ๐Ÿ ๐Ÿ 
๐ŸŒฑ๐ŸŒณ๐Ÿฆƒ๐Ÿฆ†๐Ÿ“๐Ÿ” ๐ŸฆŒ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ–๐Ÿ— ๐Ÿ ๐Ÿก๐ŸŸ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿฆ‘๐Ÿฆ๐Ÿข๐Ÿฆช๐Ÿฆ€๐Ÿฆž๐Ÿœ๐Ÿž๐Ÿ›๐Ÿฆ‹๐Ÿ
๐Ÿฅผ๐Ÿฆด
๐Ÿฑ๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿฅ—๐Ÿฅ˜
๐Ÿ„๐Ÿ…๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ‡๐Ÿˆ๐Ÿ‰๐ŸŠ๐Ÿ‹๐ŸŒ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ’๐Ÿ“๐Ÿ ๐Ÿฅ‘๐Ÿฅ’๐Ÿฅ”๐Ÿฅ•๐Ÿฅœ๐Ÿฅ๐Ÿฅฅ๐Ÿฅฆ๐Ÿฅฌ๐Ÿฅญ๐ŸŒฐ
๐Ÿฅ–๐Ÿฅ—๐Ÿฅ˜๐Ÿฅ™๐Ÿฅš๐Ÿฅž๐ŸฅŸ๐Ÿฅ“
๐Ÿฅ ๐Ÿฅก๐Ÿฅข๐Ÿฅฃ
๐Ÿฅง๐Ÿฅจ๐Ÿฅฉ๐Ÿฅช๐Ÿฅซ๐Ÿฅฎ๐Ÿฅฏ
๐Ÿ”๐Ÿ•๐Ÿ–๐Ÿ—๐ŸŒญ๐ŸŒฎ๐ŸŒฏ๐Ÿก๐Ÿข๐Ÿš๐Ÿฃ๐Ÿค๐Ÿฅ๐Ÿ›๐Ÿœ๐Ÿ๐Ÿž๐ŸŸ
๐Ÿฆ๐Ÿง๐Ÿจ๐Ÿฉ๐Ÿช๐Ÿซ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿฐ
๐Ÿš‘๐Ÿš•๐Ÿš๐Ÿ›’๐Ÿ›๐Ÿšฝ
๐Ÿ‘•๐Ÿฅฟ๐Ÿฅพ
๐Ÿต๐Ÿง‰๐Ÿงƒ๐Ÿฅค


2019-10-18:

INPUTS=SOURCES+SKILLS
land โฌœ
home ๐Ÿก
farm ๐Ÿšœ
cook ๐Ÿณ
dentist ๐Ÿฆท
doctor ๐Ÿฅ
optic ๐Ÿ‘€
mechanic ๐Ÿ› 
driver ๐Ÿšš
store ๐Ÿช
safe ๐Ÿš’

OUTPUTS=GOODS+SERIVICES=PRODUCTS
wash  ๐Ÿšฟ
dress ๐Ÿ‘–
eat   ๐Ÿฅช
drink ๐Ÿฅ›
rest  ๐Ÿ›



2019-10-17: Quench the Rent!


2019-10-16: "'Transitional Basic Income F.A.Qs'" https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MC0-nkRXkciv7-TOkQFPC2zGHI_YBJlYwNzG79NJo_E


2019-10-16: github.com/daohaus/paper >>Rental Price: The price in Ether that is required to be sent in order to book 1 night


2019-10-16: PipeLineFoods.com >>Developing sustainable supply chains in agriculture.


2019-10-16: CollaborationIncubator.net >>


2019-10-16:
git clone git://git.code.sf.net/p/dnt/code dnt
cd dnt/
cmake .
make
cd bin/
./dnt


2019-10-14: "'Genesis DAO Reputation request'" -- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YNlcYDZTaHUPshF9k6EGbaUQJjSc3yKcq0-llVNkFGY


2019-10-14: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QBJiyq0npn-wjVGDT_GSfK0iWnOy-OKgIi-jPFAoI3k
Who we are:
  We are Token Engineers, Social Strategists and Permaculture Practitioners changing how we fund, own and work to align ecology with economy to allow regenerative abundance without a conflict of value.

Fund: ๐Ÿ‘คโ†’๐Ÿ’ฐโ†๐Ÿฅ‘โ‡‡๐ŸŒณ
Sell future products to fund sources without debt.  This is just rewards-based crowdfunding so we can buy land and tools without debt.

Work: ๐Ÿ‘คโ†’๐Ÿ‘ทโ†๐Ÿฅ‘+๐ŸŒณ
  Work to own product now and to own future sources without rent.  Workers receive a "Basic Outcome" of food and shelter and gain real property as that work is completed.

Own: ๐Ÿ‘คโ†๐Ÿฅ‘โ‡‡๐ŸŒณ
  Own sources to own those products without purchase.  Owners accept the product itself as the natural ROI and so avoid profit to others.

Recurse: ๐Ÿ‘คโ†’๐Ÿ’ฐโ†๐Ÿฅ‘+๐ŸŒณ
  Buy surplus to own product now and to own future sources without rent.  Those who pay profit while buying surplus gain real property as those profits are invested for them.

User Interface
Define New Product: Document all Sources (land, tools, etc.) and Skills (human effort) required to create some quantity and quality of a Product (good or service).

Buy Future Product: Prepay for a Product with either money or Skills.
Paying with Skills unassociated with that Product is limited by the trade-connections of that user.

Sell Future Product: Commit to apply Skills toward future Production.
If you try to commit a Skill you have not proven, the system shows the steps required to qualify for that job.



2019-10-13: "'In Search of Commons that Scale'" -- Docs.Google.com/document/d/1ZC7PDNv6Dh-7LMf3TK1taRrK83Ogsx8DMsPApR8LPrA


2019-10-13:
๐Ÿ‘คโ†’๐Ÿ’ฐโ†๐Ÿฅ‘ Fund to own future product.
๐Ÿ‘คโ†๐Ÿฅ‘โ‡‡๐ŸŒณ Own sources to own future product.
๐Ÿ‘คโ†’๐Ÿ‘ทโ†๐Ÿฅ‘โ†๐ŸŒณ Work to own product now and future sources.
v๐Ÿ‘คโ†’๐Ÿ’ฐโ†๐Ÿฅ‘โ†๐ŸŒณ Pay to own product now and future sources.


๐Ÿ‘ฅ ๐Ÿ”œ ๐Ÿ‘ท๐Ÿ‘ท
๐Ÿ‘ฅ ๐Ÿ”™ ๐Ÿ•
๐Ÿ‘ท๐Ÿ‘ท ๐Ÿ”™ ๐Ÿก

๐Ÿ‘ค ๐Ÿ’ฐ โ‡„ ๐Ÿฅ‘
๐Ÿ‘ค ๐Ÿ’ต  โ‡„  ๐ŸŒณ


2019-10-13: Wiki.P2PFoundation.net/Resource-Based_Economy


2019-10-11: KeyBase.io/PatrickTAnderson


2019-10-11:
Source Wars: Conquest through Embargo
We promise future goods and services
to acquire the sources and skills
property and promises


2019-10-11:
If we assume a 'fair' system
would have INPUTs equal OUTPUTs,

And if we use property
if we commit work
before production begins,
the flow of value cancels-out,
so few tokens need flow


2019-10-09: Pondering a better tomorrow through private property ownership of land and productive asssets held under the For Product model.  T.me/HouseParty2020


2019-10-09: Just discovered the term "Protocol Economics" describing node compensation for blockchain work.


2019-10-09:
The talk of slums made me think again
food sovereignty MUST include housing.

Rent is 0 when owners occupy.
Let us dare to own to occupy.

We will buy land for $1/ftยฒ
to permanently quench rent!

On embargos, tarrifs and trade agreements:
Invoking localized production chains
to create semi-sovereign nodes
on land acquired and governed
through a DAO interface.

Potential partners:
  OneCommunityGlobal.org
  GeoffLawtonOnline.com
  OpenSourceEcology.org
  Transition-Lab.org
  DecentraLand.org
so many more...

Now looking at DAOCanvas.WebFlow.io



2019-10-09:
"An organization or economic system where goods are produced
but *not* exchanged because property ownership in the Sources
caused those goods to be pre-allocated to those people who
need them, thereby 'imputing' the final sale of those goods
and causing profit to disappear in a puff of greasy smoke."


2019-10-09:
I have found something that looks like part of a solution...

Business is kinda like:
Sources (๐ŸŒณ: The INPUTS of production)
Actions (๐Ÿ‘ท: Work such as planting ๐ŸŒณ or harvesting ๐Ÿฅ‘)
Products (๐Ÿฅ‘: The OUTPUTS of production)
Profits (๐Ÿ’ฐ: If ๐Ÿฅ‘ is sold for a price *above* the real costs of production.)

With two separable stages:

Production: ๐ŸŒณ + ๐Ÿ‘ท = ๐Ÿฅ‘
Sales: ๐Ÿฅ‘ โ‡„ ๐Ÿ’ฐ

In traditional business, the INPUTS๐ŸŒณ are owned by workers๐Ÿ‘ท or by random humans (shareholders).

Since the owners of INPUTS๐ŸŒณ are automatically the owners of OUTPUTS๐Ÿฅ‘,
the OUTPUTS๐Ÿฅ‘ *must* be sold to consumers after they are produced.

But we could 'optimize' sales out of existence
by using property ownership over the INPUTS๐ŸŒณ to
"pre-allocate" the OUTPUTS๐Ÿฅ‘ to those consumers.

This is done by building business where the
INPUTS๐ŸŒณ are owned by the consumers because they want the OUTPUTS๐Ÿฅ‘,
and so accept the OUTPUTS๐Ÿฅ‘ as the 'natural' return on investment.

This removes the need to sell the finished OUTPUTS๐Ÿฅ‘
since they are *already* owned by the people who will consume them.

The price each of these special consumers pays
is simply the costs they each paid as a co-owner,
causing profit to be UNDEFINED since the transaction does not occur.

Even though there is no profit being collected by this business,
these special shareholders are happy because they were able to
*avoid* paying profit for those OUTPUTS๐Ÿฅ‘ they would have otherwise
paid if they had bought those OUTPUTS๐Ÿฅ‘ from another business.


2019-10-07: Torus.1Hive.org/#/credao/0xe8ed60db980d7dfdac724ca034f0cdeb500d652b


2019-10-07:
The eC DAO sells "Future Product" subscriptions to host regenerative abundance.

eC can be whatever production you require or desire.
Taxes and votes are replaced by direct citizen-owner control.

Undeveloped land is often less than $1/ftยฒ.

Regenerative abundance starts with permaculture and natural building.
Permaculture imitates nature for environments that reintegrate humans.

Natural building uses local materials to create low-impact structures
respecting solar and lunar cycles through nearly motionless solutions.

The ingredients required to boot the pilot project:

Land (real estate), including all fees and taxes.

Water rights: Many variations on how this must be done.

Startup supplies: Tents, bedding, water filters, clothing, soap, etc.

Tools, supplies and skills to:
Collect heat from olar + compost + wood-chip stoves, etc.
Cook shared meals.
Make soap and other basic sanatation supplies.
Build composting toilets.
Install and care for flora, fauna and fungi as productive landscapes.

How we are different:
  We avoid paying rent, profit and interest by holding property For Product.

How we will get there:
  Sell future products to fund the sources of production.
    This means we will crowdfund the land and tools to begin.

  Vest source ownership to those who achieve that production.
    This means workers become owners as commitments are fulfilled.

  Use source ownership to own future products without purchase.
    This means members own land and tools because they need the results.

  Sell surplus products to fund the sources of production.
    This means extra goods and services are sold to buy more sources.



2019-10-07: The For Product model attempts to scale the efficiency of home economics.


2019-10-07: Falling ever deeper into my addiciton with The Prodigy MixCloud.com/MixesForTheMasses/dj-richie-the-prodigy-experience-071192-gt-yarmouth


2019-10-04:
Pass Howey Test by vesting source ownership only when paying with work, never when paying with money.

Pay with money to receive a single round of production like reward-based crowdfunding, or as a recurring subscription.


2019-10-04: CollaborationIncubator.net


2019-10-04:
What we want: Permacultured private cities owned and operated by those citizens.
How we are different: The recently finalized For Product development model.
How we will get there:
  Sell future products to fund the sources of production.
    This means we will crowdfund the land and tools to begin.
  Vest source ownership to those who achieve that production.
    This means workers become owners as commitments are fulfilled.
  Use source ownership to own future products without purchase.
    This means members own land and tools because they need the results.
  Sell surplus products to fund the sources of production.
    This means extra goods and services are sold to buy more sources.


2019-10-04: keybase.io/lkngtn github.com/criptocervantes


2019-10-02: The "For Product" business model rewrite:
1. Buy future products to fund the sources of production.
2. Gain source ownership as you produce those products.
3. Own sources to own future products without purchase.
4. Buy surplus products to fund the sources of production.